Just read an interesting item in the July 20, 2009 Fortune Magazine on page 60 entitled, "No Free Lunch" (not available online at the Fortune Magazine web site when this entry was written). It concerned the now famous Stewart Brand quote about the freedom of information.
In 1984 at the first "Hackers Conference," Stewart Brand, famous also for the Whole Earth Catalog, stated, "information wants to be free" which is widely quoted as a call for free distribution of all information. Brand's actual statement was, however, far more ambiguous. He actually said in fuller context, "On the one hand, information wants to be expensive, because it's so valuable. The right information in the right place just changes your life. On the other hand, information wants to be free because the cost of getting it out is getting lower and lower all of the time. So you just have these two fighting against each other."
In response, Steve Wozniak, the not so good dancer on Dancing with the Stars and co-founder of Apple Computer, replied to Brand that "Information should be free, but your time should not."
It seems like Wozniak captured more of the notional reality than Stewart Brand. While laws that protect intellectual property continue to create value in certain types of information and creative content, the reality is that this capture is less complete and shorter in duration than ever because of various technological tools.
As the value of information and creative content has itself declined, the value of interacting with the actual creator of the content seems to have gone up. For example, musicians are getting less and less value from their recorded music and more and more value from their live performances. The same trend also seems to impact on book authors and speaking engagements.
This dovetails nicely with Wozniak's comment that information should be free, but not ones time. While we may see a pull back in the years ahead from "free information" as we know it on the web today, the long term trend is pretty clear. Information and creative content are going to remain in a protected form that can be directly monetized for a shorter and shorter period of time.
The business and social cycle that turns most manufactured goods and most services into a commodity over time and which also tends to move most creative content over time into the public domain of free things is growing shorter and shorter. In contrast, the value of human input and attention measured as the time a person invests in a productive activity continues to exist at some level in the economic system and is likely to endure. In some sense, this reality is almost medieval and speaks to a time when the value of a guildsman or craftsman was at its highest. Of course, we have a completely different kind of guildsman today. All of the vocations that were performed by guildsman in medieval times are now performed by mechanical devices and a new type of guildsman is emerging with a different set of skills such as the design and development of software and web platforms.
As businessmen, we will over the long run have to adapt to this "retro-" reality.
Erich P. Rapp.